Truth about the media reports.

Rajdeep Sardesai has been a news man for quite some time. He is presently editor in chief of CNN-IBN. In his column in the Hindustan times of 28.4.06 he writes "In the corridors of power, politians and journalists share a perticularly incestuous relationship based upon mutual need....politian feeds journalist with priveleged information, the journalist depends upon neta for access....in recent times much of the information disseminated is propoganda, while accesses obtained by the journalist spurred partisan reportage....... "

So now we all know the reality behind the 24 hours of news bombardment on the minds of the people of this republic. Advani- Vajpayee spat? Halo around Nehru-Gandhi family?The left leaning of the 'crusaders'? Some one has very appropriatly named his web site wispersincorridore.com. Do not guess, it is about government officials et al!

The phenomenon Rajdeep mentions is not new, it has been there always and it is there every where but then, whom do you go to for the real news? It is you who has to do the lateral thinking, look into the third dimention of all the rubbish that you are fed with, and draw the right conclusion. Be your own judge and discard all headlines of every news carrying vehicle, it is sheer junk!

Trust me, the headline grabbing famous tapes of the functions of the Don were fed to the channels by the police itself. Trust me a very famous Muslim Royal, who has one big film to claim and designs dresses along with his third -hindu-converted-to-islam- wife, despite being a rally leading leftist, still uses his former royal crest on even the shit he passes out. Even his dresses are shown and sold as from the 'House of K-----a' ! Not a single news soul has ever pointed this out, not a single comie, who are after the neck of King Gyanendra of Nepal, have ever asked this comerade to shed off his Royality?

Wake up to the reality of junk you are being fed with. Eat healthy, stay fit!

Ancestral property valued 15 lakhs...?

Last week Mrs. Sonia Gandhi declared her assets at the time of filing her nomination papers for Rae bareli seat. The list of her assets appeared on almost all national dailies. The vigilant press, the content starved TV news channels, and all else however over looked a small information which again remains beyond the understanding of this, yours sincerely.

I hate to borrow, but I'll make a compromise this time; let me borrow Bharat ki Maharani(Queen of India) from Mr. Amar Singh-a RICH socialist Member of Parliament(M.P.) of Samajwadi(meaning- socialist) Party- he uses this contemparory & perhaps apt address for HER quite often- well that is where my agreementwith him begins and also ends- So when Bharat ki Maharani Sonia Gandhi declared her assets, she mentioned "ancestral property in Italy" valued Rs. 15,00000.00 ?

Sure, for those who have no information about the value of properties in Europe would digest this out of ignorance however, I'm sure even these ignorants must be in possession of some general knowledge (GK) about the rates of property even here in India? Before they 'ignorantly' digest this, I'd invoke theirGK about the little they'd get for a partly sum of 15 lakhs in any town of India?

So in my contention if Bharat ki Maharani owns a property worth 15,00000.00 (aprox. 20-22000 Euros), in Italy, then it must be either be a hutment equal to some tiny dwelling in JJ(Jhuggi-Jhopri[shanty]) colony or an accomodation equal to one in Recreational Vehicle (RV).

Don't you feel that either the calculations are wrong, or IGNORANCE IS BEING USED AS A GIFTED VIRTUE? A property costing 15 lakhs in Italy despite all cost reducing tactics will mean that either Bharat ki Maharani has a depeleted hutment as an ancesterol property or -going by the reported information-the Euros are being addressed as Rupees here-all and sundry know THE truth?

Could we, the praja (subjects) have the TOTAL description of the tittle ancestoral property worth Rs.15 Lakhs, PLEASE?

SHYAM

Bhim Rao Ambedkar

The Government of India and the self appointed official exploitors of Dalit-vote-bank in India celebrate his 115th birthday on this 14th April. Sad it is to see his ill made statuette or bust errected in almost every city, and mostly in slums!
One question that has remained unanswered to me is the licence that so called Heros of Dalit/Minority vote bank have awarded to themselves to use Dr. Ambedkars name, without qualifying a tittle bit to use it?
Dr. Ambedkar made his intention to convert known years before he actually converted to Buddhism . It is a well known fact that he was approached by Muslims and Christians to convert to their respective creeds and his reply to them was that he would only like to convert to a religion that is indigenous to the land of India. In other words he did not hide his contempt towards these forcible imports! He also made it very clear that he was converting to Buddhism not because he had any disregard towards Hinduism, rather he wanted to shock Hindu society to wake up and tackle the menace of castism, which was one single cause of erosion of Hindu society, in its entire history.
I'am equally surprised to see Dr. Ambedkar sitting next to Lord Budha in new Budhist temples and Dalit houses, as if this convert was an avtar of the lord Budha himself?
Isn't it funny?